The publication of peer-reviewed articles  in the Kriez Academy Journal  is an important cornerstone in the development of a coherent and respected knowledge network. This is a direct reflection of the quality of the author's work and the institutions that support it. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree on standards of ethical behavior that are expected of all parties involved in the act of publishing: authors, journal editors, peer reviewers, publishers, and the public.

Organisasi Kreatif Indonesia Emas as the publisher of Kriez Academy Journal of Development and Community Service  carries out its duties with full sincerity in overseeing all stages of publication, and we recognize ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprints, or other commercial revenue does not influence or influence editorial decisions.

Publication decision

Jesocin Journal editors are responsible for deciding which articles are submitted to the journal should be published. Validation of the research and the importance of the research to researchers and readers should always drive the decision. Editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and limited by applicable legal requirements regarding defamation, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. Editors can consult with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

An editor at all times evaluates a manuscript based on its intellectual content regardless of the author's race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, nationality, or political philosophy.

The editor and any editorial staff shall not disclose any information about submitted manuscripts to anyone other than related authors, reviewers, prospective reviewers, other editorial advisors, and publishers, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflict of interestMaterial that is not published and disclosed in the submitted manuscript may not be used in the editor's own research without written permission from the author.

Peer review assists editors in making editorial decisions and editorial communication with authors can also assist authors in improving papers.

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in the manuscript or knows that a quick review is not possible should notify the editor and seek permission from the review process.

Any manuscript accepted for review should be treated as a confidential document. The document may not be shown or discussed with others except with the permission of the editor.

Standard of ObjectivityReview should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. The referee must express his views clearly with supporting arguments.

The reviewer must identify relevant published works that have not been cited by the author. Any statement stating observations, derivations, or arguments have been previously reported should be accompanied by relevant citations. A reviewer should also call the editor's attention if there are substantial similarities or overlaps between the manuscript under consideration and other published papers of which they are personally aware.

Information or privileged ideas obtained through peer review should be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts to have conflicts of interest caused by competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any author, company, or institution associated with the paper.

The author of the original research report should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. The underlying data must be accurately presented in the paper. A paper should contain enough detail and references to allow others to replicate the work. False or intentionally inaccurate statements are unethical and unacceptable behavior.

Originality and Plagiarism Authors must ensure that they have written the entire original work, and if the author has used the work and/or the words of others then the work has been appropriately cited or cited.

An author should not generally publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one major journal or publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal simultaneously is unethical and unacceptable publishing behavior.

Proper recognition of the work of others should always be given. Authors should cite publications that are influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported research. All parties who have made significant contributions must be listed as co-authors. If there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be recognized or listed as contributors. Correspondent authors must ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included in the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and approved its submission for publication.

All authors must disclose in their manuscript any financial conflicts of interest or other substantive conflicts of interest that may be construed to affect the outcome or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project must be disclosed.

When an author finds significant errors or inaccuracies in his published work, it is the author's obligation to immediately notify the editor of the journal or publisher and cooperate with the editor to revoke or correct the paper.