PERBANDINGAN EFEKTIFITAS TERAPI INVANSIF DAN NON-INVANSIF PADA PASIEN GAGAL NAPAS AKUT

Authors

  • Yohana Saputra Politeknik Tiara Bunda

Keywords:

Respiratory Failure, NIV, Intubation, P/F Ratio, pCO2, Respiratory Rate

Abstract

Respiratory Failure is defi ned as respiratory system inability to compensate oxygenation, ventilation and metabolic needs of the patient. In respiratory distress patient who needs intubation and sedation, it is highly related with the incidence of Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP) and would increases the number of morbidity and mortality. Recently, NIV is one of alternative option for respiratory failure. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of NIV and specify proportion on respiratory failure patients in ICU. Objective: This research is to knowing association between duration of mechanical ventilator use with mortality in ICU can help reducing the factors that cause patient’s mortality in ICU. Methods: This research was done prospectively with randomized controlled trial parallel design. Randomization was performed by permutation block. The sample was 30 adult patients. Samples were recorded by clinical respiration changes, haemodynamic stability, and blood gas analysis. Each data will be analyzed by T test. For data proportion, it will be underwent chi-square test. Results: Demographic characteristic (age, sex, body mass index, operative status, APACHE II score) of the patients were similar in two groups (p>0.05). Based on the t-count for P/F ratio, pCO2 level and respiratory rate before and after given NIV = 0.010.05, we can conclude there were no statistically significant. This could be happened due to 3 hours evaluation is not enough, so it would not give a fast improvement to clinical respiration and acid-base status. In the fi rst 3-hour, NIV treatment in respiratory failure patients in the ICU Dr Sardjito General Hospital had a better effect in improving clinical respiration, P/F ratio and reduce pCO2 value compared to mechanical ventilation with intubation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Gurka DP & Robert AB. 2009. Acute RespiratoryFailure in: Parillo JE & Dellinger JP (ediors), Critical Care Medicine Principle of Diagnosis and Management in Adult 3rd edition, chapter 38, pp773-789. Mosby Elsevier.

Rubenfeld G.D, Caldwell E, Peabody E, Weaver J, Martin DP, Neff M. 2005. Incidence and outcomes of acute lung injury. The New England Journal of Medicine. 353(16):1685-93.

Schettino G., Altobelli N, Kacmarek RM. 2008. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in acute respiratory failure outside clinical trials: experience at the Massachusetts General Hospital. Critical Care Medicine. 36(2):441-7.

Keenan SP, Sinuff T, Cook DJ, Hill NS. 2003. Which patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease benefit from non-invasive positive pressure ventilation? A systematic review of the literature. Ann Internal Med. 138(11): 861-70.

Demoule A, Girou E, Richard JC, Taille S, Brochard L. 2006. Benefi ts and risks of success or failure of non-invasive ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 32(11):1756-65.

Rocker G.M, McKenzie MG., William B, Logan PM. 1999. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation: successful outcome in patients with acute lung injury/ ARDS. CHEST.115(1):173-7.

Antonelli M, Conti G., Moro MI, Esquinas A, Gonzales-Diaz G., Confalonieri M. 2001. Predictors of failure of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure: a multicenter study. Intensive Care Med. 27(11):1718-28.

Honrubia T, Garcia Lopez FJ, Franco N, Mas M, Guevara M, Daguerre M. 2005. Non-invasive vs conventional mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory failure: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial. CHEST. 128(6):3196-24.

Jolliet P, Abajo B, Pasquina P, Chevrolet JC. 2001. Non-invasive pressure support ventilation in severe community-acquired pneumonia. Intensive Care Med. 27(5):812-21.

Antonelli M, Conti G., Esquinas A., Montini L., Maggiore S.M., Bello G., et.al., 2007. A multiple-center survey on the use in clinical practice on non-invasive ventilation as a firstline intervention for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Critical Care Medicine. 35(1):18-25.

Kindgen-Milles D, Buhl R, Loer SA, Muller E. 2002. Nasal CPAP therapy: effects of different CPAP levels on pressure transmission into the trachea and pulmonary oxygen transfer. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 46(7):860-5.

Matte P, Jacquet L, Van Dyck M, Goenen M. 2000. Effects of conventional physiotherapy, continous positive airway pressure and noninvasive ventilator support with bilevel positive airway pressure after coronary artery bypass grafting. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 44(1):75-81.

Sastroasmoro S. 2018. Usulan Penelitian, dalam: Sastroasmoro S & Ismail S (editor), Dasar-dasar Metodologi Penelitian Klinis edisi 2. Jakarta : Sagung Seto.

Claudett KB, Monica BC, Miguel CS, Hector AM, Diego CP, Michel G.A. 2019. Non-invasive ventilation in relapse of acute respiratory failure outside ICU. Journal of Clinical Medicine and Research. 2(3):26-34.

Balzan MV. 1997. Age and Sex Distribution of Adult Asthma Admission: a study of five year cumulative prevalance. Maltese Medical Journal. 9(1): 28.

Hill NS. 2006. Non-invasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation in: Tobin MJ (editor), Principles & Practice of Mechanical Ventilation 2nd edition, chapter 19, pp433-63. McGraw-Hill.

Sugiman T. 2011. Sistem Skor di Intensive Care Unit, dalam: Indonesian Journal of Intensive Care Medicine, vol 1, hal 76-87. PERDICI.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-09

How to Cite

Saputra, Y. (2023). PERBANDINGAN EFEKTIFITAS TERAPI INVANSIF DAN NON-INVANSIF PADA PASIEN GAGAL NAPAS AKUT . Journal of Anesthesiology Tiara Bunda, 1(2), 40–50. Retrieved from https://jurnal.poltektiarabunda.ac.id/index.php/jatb/article/view/222